6. Vladimir V. Podgornyy

Specific Aspects of Structural Organization of Conceptual Management as a Component of Social Management

  • Contact details
  • Abstract
  • References

Vladimir V. Podgornyy

Professor at the Department of Donetsk Academy of Management and Public Service at the Head of the Donetsk People's Republic, Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

Chelyuskintsev Str. 163A, Donetsk, 83015

The present study examines the existing approaches to the interpretation of the nature of conceptual power, substantiates the methodology of a structural organization of conceptual management, and develops its model.
Aim. The study aims to substantiate the structural organization of a conceptual management model.
Tasks. The existing approaches to the interpretation of the nature of conceptual power are examined. The methodology of a structural organization within a conceptual management model is substantiated. A conceptual management model is developed, which is based on the interrelation and interdependence of the management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operation process, and conceptual operation matrix.
Methods. This study substantiates the methodology of structural organization of a conceptual management model, which includes substantiation of its structural elements — conceptual and ideological power, managerial, national, and social ideology, the interaction of which lies at the heart of implementation of conceptual management — the management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operational process, conceptual operations matrix, and creates optimal conditions for achieving a dual result: formation of a rational social behavior paradigm and a framework that generates beneficial social activity.
Results. A methodology of structural organization of a social lifestyle model based on the interaction of conceptual and ideological power, managerial, national, and social ideology. This methodology makes it possible to substantiate the structural organization of a conceptual management model, which includes the management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operational process, conceptual operations matrix aimed at the formation of a rational social behavior paradigm and a framework that generates beneficial social activity. The process of formation of rational social behavior and beneficial social activity is represented as a closed system. The driving force behind all processes within that cycle is national ideology, which affects the results of implementation of a progressive future concept.
Conclusion. Examination of the existing interpretations of the nature of conceptual power makes it possible to substantiate the methodology of structural organization of a conceptual management model and to develop a corresponding model that functions through interaction between the managerial concept, a national ideology, a progressive future concept, a conceptual operation process, and a conceptual operation matrix, all of which facilitate the formation of a rational social behavior paradigm and a framework that generates beneficial social activity.

Keywords: management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operation process, conceptual operation matrix, conceptual environment, social behavioral imperative, conceptual power

Citation:Podgornyy V. V. Osobennosti strukturnoy organizatsii kontseptual’nogo upravleniya kak sostavlyaushey sotsial’nogo upravleniya [Specific aspects of structural organization of Conceptual Management as a component of Social Management]. Ekonomika i Upravlenie, 2018, no. 6 (152), pp. 38–48.

References

  1. Grigorenko D. E. Liberalizm kak teoriya i kontseptsiya upravleniya obshchestvom [Liberalism as the theory and the conception of social management]. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta im. akademika M. F. Reshetneva, 2006, no. 4 (11), pp. 112–116.
  2. Solon’ko I. V. Fenomen kontseptual’noy vlasti v kontekste tsivilizatsionnykh protsessov [Phenomenon of the conceptual power in a context of civilization processes]. Izvestiya Mezhdunarodnoy akademii agrarnogo obrazovaniya, 2012, vol. 3, no. 15, pp. 36–40.
  3. Svistunov D. E. Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoretiko-pravovoye issledovaniye [National security in the Russian Federation: Theoretical and legal study]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoricheskiye nauki. Yuridicheskiye nauki, 2017, vol. 3, no. 1 (9), pp. 78–82.
  4. Gorshenkov G. N. Kontseptual’naya vlast’ i antikorruptsionnoye dvizheniye v strane [Conceptual power and anticorruption movement in the country]. Aktual’nyye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2013, no. 2 (26), pp. 225–232.
  5. Sulimin A. N. Novyye formy upravleniya v global’noy informatsionnoy srede i problemy natsional’noy bezopasnosti RF [New forms of governance in the global information environment, and problems of the RF national security]. Voprosy upravleniya, 2015, no. 4 (16), pp. 56–60.
  6. Gretskaya O. S. Kontseptsiya «zolotogo milliarda» v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [The concept of the “golden billion” in international relations]. Sibirskiy torgovo-ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2008, no. 7, pp. 73–75.
  7. Beck U. Was ist Globalisierung? [What is globalization?]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997. 267 p. (Russ. ed.: Beck U. Chto takoe globalizatsiya?: Oshibki globalizma — otvety na globalizatsiyu. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2001. 304 p.).
  8. Toffler O. Problemy vlasti na poroge XXI veka [The problems of power on the threshold of the XXI century]. Svobodnaya mysl’, 1992, no. 2, pp. 113–120.
  9. Parsons T. The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Publ., 1971. 152 p. (Russ. ed.: Parsons T. Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ., 1998. 270 p.).

Subscribe to electronic version of the article