9. Marat A. Sarygulov

Technological Development, Structural Imbalances, and the Evolution of Entrepreneurship

  • Contact details
  • Abstract
  • References

Marat A. Sarygulov

Postgraduate Student St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics

Lermontovskiy Ave 44/A, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 190103

The present study examines major factors that affect the development of new forms of entrepreneurship in the context of rapidly growing digital platforms.
Aim. The study aims to analyze major factors, and their effects on changes in the forms of entrepreneurship, in contexts where advanced technology impacts the economic environment.
Tasks. The authors assess the prospects for entrepreneurial development in the context of digital platforms.
Methods. This study uses scientific analysis and fusion of information from a vast range of literature sources to examine the establishment and development of entrepreneurship based on digital platforms.
Results. Digital-based advanced technologies, such as mobile Internet, automation of intellectual labor, Internet pertaining to things, cloud technologies, advanced robotics, autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles, and 3D printing, along with such macroeconomic factors as structural imbalances, have been significantly changing the industrial economic structure and labor market conditions. They also form a new business ecosystem, providing new opportunities to meet consumer needs. An important aspect of technological change is that products based on it are available to the mass consumer which, in turn, significantly expands the scope of opportunities for all participants of economic processes: entrepreneurs, consumers, and employees.
Conclusion. Qualitative changes in the global economy significantly alter the business environment, which is reflected in its forms and economic performance. Advanced technology and structural imbalances have triggered a new stage of development. Due to their organization, digital platforms significantly extend the support base of entrepreneurship, which should be regarded as a positive trend. This trend is will only be further consolidated if institutional and legislative ingress does not hinder its development.

Keywords: advanced technology, structural changes, entrepreneurship, digital platforms

Citation: Sarygulov M. A. Tekhnologicheskoe razvitie, strukturnye disbalansy i evolutsiya predprinimatel’stva [Technological Development, Structural Imbalances, and the Evolution of Entrepreneurship]. Ekonomika i Upravlenie, 2018, no. 7 (153), pp. 65–72.


  1. Manyika J., Chui M., Bughin J., Dobbs R., Bisson P., Marrs A. Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute. 2013. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/Disruptive%20technologies/MGI_Disruptive_technologies_Full_report_May2013.ashx. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  2. EconStats. Available at: http://www.econstats.com/wdi/wdiv_597.htm. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  3. Fixed broadband subscriptions (68 countries). Available at: https://www.nakono.com/tekcarta/databank/full/2. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  4. Transport. Eurostat. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/transport/data/database. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  5. Pilat D., Cimper A., Olsen K., Webb C. The changing nature of manufacturing in OECD economies. STI Working Paper 2006/9. OECD. 2006. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/37607831.pdf. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  6. Baily M. N., Bosworth B. P. US manufacturing: Understanding its past and its potential future. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–26.
  7. Nager A. Trade vs. productivity: What caused U.S. manufacturing’s decline and how to revive it. ITIF. 2017. Available at: http://www2.itif.org/2017-tradevs-productivity.pdf. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  8. Chakrabortty A. Why doesn’t Britain make things any more? 2011. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/nov/16/why-britain-doesntmake-things-manufacturing. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  9. Hathaway I., Litan R. E. Declining business dynamism in the United States: A look at states and metros. Economic Studies at Brookings. May 2014. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/declining_business_dynamism_hathaway_litan.pdf. Accessed 06.05.2018.
  10. Litan R. E. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and antitrust. American Antitrust Institute. 2016. Available at: http://www.antitrustinstitute.org/sites/default/files/Litan.pdf. Accessed 16.05.2018.
  11. Haltiwanger J. Top ten signs of declining business dynamism and entrepreneurship in the U.S. 2015. Available at: http://econweb.umd.edu/~haltiwan/Haltiwanger_Kauffman_Conference_August_1_2015.pdf. Accessed 16.05.2018.
  12. Roure J. Factors that influence the formation of new technological enterprises. IESE Working Paper WP-131, March 1988. Business School, University of Navarra, IESE. Available at: https://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0131-E.pdf Accessed 18.05.2018.
  13. Van Alstyne M. Platform Shift: How new biz models are changing the shape of industry. 2015. Available at: http://chairgovreg.fondation-dauphine.fr/sites/chairgovreg.fondation-dauphine.fr/files/attachments/161103_Van%20Alstyne_Marshall.pdf. Accessed 18.05.2018.
  14. Sorted. Crunchbase. Available at: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/sorted. Accessed 18.05.2018.
  15. Growing sorted from 600 to 15,000 signups in 4 months — with James Pursey. YHP. Available at: http://yhponline.com/2013/05/14/james-pursey-sortedapp/Accessed 18.05.2018.
  16. James Pursey. Linked in. Available at: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/jamespursey Accessed 18.05.2018.
  17. Fixura starts P2P lending in Finland. P2P-Banking. Available at: https://www.p2p-banking.com/countries/baltic-fixura-starts-p2p-lending-in-finland/. Accessed 18.05.2018.
  18. Hoe werkt het? [How does it work?]. Thuisafgehaald. Available at: https://www.thuisafgehaald.nl/hoewerkt-het-206847/item206847. Accessed 18.05.2018. (in Dutch).
  19. Deelplatform Peerby crowdfundt in recordtijd twee miljoen [Sub-platform Peerby crowdfunded two million in record time]. Peerby Nederland. Available at: http://pers.peerby.nl/124684-deelplatform-peerby-crowdfundt-in-recordtijd-twee-miljoen. Accessed 18.05.2018. (in Dutch).
  20. Crowdsourcing platform TaskRabbit. Crowdsourcing. ru. Available at: http://crowdsourcing.ru/sites/73. Accessed 18.05.2018. (in Russ.).
  21. Dervojeda K., Verzijl D., Nagtegaal F., Lengton M., Rouwmaat E. The sharing economy: Accessibility based business models for peer-to-peer markets. PwC Luxembourg. 2013. Available at: https://ru.scribd.com/document/304600036/12-She-Accessibility-Based-Business-Models-for-Peer-to-Peer-Markets-En. Accessed 24.05.2018.
  22. Codagnone C., Biagi F., Abadie F. The passions and the interests: Unpacking the “sharing economy”. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC Science for Policy Report EUR 27914 EN. 2016. DOI:10.2791/474555. Available at: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC101279/jrc101279.pdf. Accessed 24.05.2018.

Subscribe to electronic version of the article